2600 FRAUDULENT SALE DEEDS " Fruits of Contempt"

02 CCC.87 of 2004 Contempt of Court Case.. Live

041.05  Contempt of Court Act, 1971
000.02.02s 
CCC 87 of 2004

" Un-Holy & Anti-Constitutional  Nexus Between 'Karnataka Judges' and 'Karnataka Government'  " for
Judges PLOT for PLOT of Land

000.02.01s  Writ Petition No.40994 of 2002  Interim Order
000.02.02s  Order in Criminal Contempt of Court Case No. 87 of 2004
000.02s High Court's Contempt Orders 17 Dec 2004J.Reddy.Int.Order

 

PUNCH LINE The claim of Fraud Judges Society stating that BDA has approved the layout plan is just not a fraud on Law , Facts , BDA & High Court but also a conspiracy in the kind of Un-Holy-Alliance with Govt. of Karnataka in 1992; but to be admiited & revealed by Fraud Judges in the year 2002. [040.02][040.21]

BOTTOM LINE : 500 to 600 sites to be Demolished out of 2600 sites already Registered, High Court in some cases approved loans & most have built Houses ; by Fraud , Conspiracy, Cheating , Contempt of High Court etc., ; is hanging like a Sword on Fraud Judges & morefully on High Court of Karnataka in a case before it. [040.02][040.21]

A Certified copy of Sale Deed executed by the Judge Society in favour of Justice G.C.Bharuka, at present the second senior most Judge of Karnataka High Court, on April 18 `1996 [021.16][021.16s ]

At page 3 of Sale Deed the society claims thus "the Bangalore Development Authority (in short BDA) has approved Lay-Out Plan in its Board Meeting held on November 16 `1992 vide Resolution No.503/92 as per there letter No.BDA/TPM/DDW/1374/92-93 Dated 28-11-1992." [ 021.01 ][ 021.19s ]

This claim of society stating that BDA has approved the layout plan is just not a fraud but also a conspiracy of the society with the BDA, in 1992; but to be admiited & revealed by Fraud Judges in 2002 [040.02][040.21] for the following reasons supported by evidence :
Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) passes a Resolution in principle on 16th Nov, 1992 approving the layout plan in an extent of 156 acres of land (Layout called as Judicial Layout) in favour of the Co-Operative Society (KSJDEHBCS) [021.19s] in context based on the Society's letter dated 6th Nov, 1992 [021.21s ]. Matter of fact the Society was not owning one square inch of land as on 06th Nov, 1992.
Cabinet of Ministers of Govt. of Karnataka had directed in 1990 stop all land Acquisition of lands for Housing Societies [005.12s].Illegally Society was given position of an extent of 139 acres and 8.25 gunta of land by the Government represented by Special Land Aquisition Officer (SLAO) wide official memoranum dated 13-11-1992 [005.09As ]
Illegally 17 acres (156-139 = 17) was directed by the High Court of Karnataka ordered in 1994 by Mr.Justice G.P.Shiva Prakash [024.03 ](who is member of the Society, allottee of the site and has built a Palatial Bunglow ), who later became Upa-Lokayukta of Karnataka for 5 years to retire in 2002.
In 1994 Govt. of karnataka had issued Notices to all Bangalore Sub-Registrars that Sale Deeds executed by any of 32 Housing Societies should not be Registered.[021.18] [025.01Cs]. Fraud Judges Society secured a Judgment by Fraud against B.D.A & Sub-Registrar of Yelahanka in getting struck down the said Direction of Govt.Mis-Guiding Court & Mis-Leading the Court to give Fraud Judgment . Mr.Justice G.P.Shiva Prakash (who is member of the Society, allottee of the site and has built a Palatial Bunglow ), speaking through High Court of Karnataka Quashed the said Notification & consequently allowed the Registration of 2600 sale Deeds of sites formed (illegally) in so called Judicial Layout.[025.13 ] [Flash Movie]
Mr.Justice G.P.Shiva Prakash (who is member of the Society, allottee of the site and has built a Palatial Bunglow ), who later became Upa-Lokayukta of Karnataka for 5 years to retire in 2002 . Same Judge show-caused Fraud Judges Society on 28th October 1999 :" Failure to produce B.D.A.approved Layout Plan, Search & Seizure Warrant will be issued ".[023.04][023.04s ]  [Flash Movie ]
Fraud Judges got the sale deeds executed in Contempt of Judgment procured by Fraud Society, reported as ILR 1994 KAR 2115 [025.13][025.13As ] as neither B.D.A has approved Layout Plan nor has the Fraud Judges Society has executed Relinquishment Deed in favor of BDA Relinquishing 50% of lands towards Roads, open Spaces , Parks & Civic Amenity Sites ; which were mandatory actions expected from Fraud Judges Society as reflected in Judgment.
As matters stand on this day in 2003 ; B.D.A. still has not approved Layout Plan. Fraud Judges who are beneficiaries of " Fruits of Contempt" have in the guise of " Judicial Layout Residents' & Site Owners' Association " have filed Public Interest Litigation in High Court of Karnataka invoking Article 226 inter alia praying for Directions " To direct BDA to produce approved layout Plan & Direct Fraud Judges Society to Execute Relinquishment Deed in favor of BDA Relinquishing 50% of lands towards Roads, open Spaces, Parks & Civic Amenity Sites ".[040.02][040.21] It stood short of admitting that Sale Deeds are Registered in Contempt of said Judgment , illegal , null & void.
This Society consisting of only Government / Public Servants that too of Judicial Department ranking from Magistrates session Judges, High Court Judges and upto Supreme Court Judges not leave behind the Law Secretaries of Government of Karnataka knew pretty well that the land which was handed over to the Society is an agricultural land and to put this land for any other reason than agrucultural " then the Society should seek the permission as per Section 95 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.". The Registration of Sale Deeds is not only in violation of BDA Act & Judgment but also is in Contempt of Supreme Court Judgment of 1994 [002.09] [026.11As ].
This position of Law cannot be said to be unknown to BDA, as in case of poor persons who have built houses on the Un-Converted land were and are being demolished running into tens of thousands of cases in Bangalore and elsewere; whereas Govt./BDA which is having an Un-Holy-Alliance with Judiciary of Karnataka has failed to demolish the layout. This could be evidentially proved from Govt.'s 1995 Gazette Notification which forbids Registration of sale Deeds of sites formed in Agricultural Lands & reflecting Supreme Court Judgment -warns all Sub-Registrars of Karnataka. While no sites of any one which is contrary / forbidden is not Registered.
The Society instead of judicially respecting and abiding by the law " they approached the High Court of Karnataka with Writ Petition (W.P.No.2382 of 1990) [026.06]. The Judges Society got it listed before Mr.Justice S.Rajendra Babu and who happily stayed the demands of money made by Government for conversion of these agricultural lands to residential use [026.08]. Interestingly this Judge also happens to be a Member Benefically of a site on which has built a Bunglow. It is understood that the Bunglow is rented out to M/s Khoday Breweries as a Guest House. High Court slept over the case from 1990 to 1996 with corrupt motives; then dismissed the case & upheld that convertion of lands is mandatory in 1996 . Judgment pronounced by Justice Chandrashekhraiaha ; who is suspected of two sites ; also violated his own Judgment.[026.09 ]. Further story of this matter is dealt at appropriate place.
The Supreme Court by its Judgement in Civil Appeal No.5051/1994 ( The State of Karnataka and others -Vs-Shankar Textiles Limited) has ruled that conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural land is mandatory. This Judgement of which the operating portion is recited by Revenue Secretariat of Government of Karnataka in its Gazette Notification dated 14.02.1994 and so also further in its Notification dated 23.03.1996 [026.11 ]. In the said notification the Government has directed all the sub registrars of Karnataka not to register any site formed in agricultural land, and further has declared that if any such registration is made the Sale Deed shall be contrary to the law of Section 22-A of the Registration Act, 190A "which in other words such Sale Deeds or Instrument shall be Void and are fraud having no the legal validity.
A judicial scandal has always been regarded as far more deplorable 
than a scandal involving either the executive or a member of the legislature

For more on Corruption in Judiciary Click Here

This National Mission to eradicate Corrupt Judges.
  This is a National Constitutional crisis created by Judges

 E-Books in CD: Available for Donation of  Rs.2000 .
In Bangalore it is available @ Gangarams Book Bureau, M.G. Road, Bangalore.