The Supreme Court in
Skipper Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against Delhi Development
Authority observed at para 37 of its judgement [020.02] thus:
"Before parting with this case, we feel impelled to make a few
observations. What is happening in this case is illustrative of what is
happening in our country on a fairly wide scale in diverse forms. Some
persons in the upper strata (which means the rich and the influential
class of the society) have made the 'property career' the sole aim of
their life. The means have become irrelevant - in a land where its
greatest son born in this century said "means are more important than the
ends". A sense of bravado prevails; everything can be managed; every
authority and every institution can be managed. All it takes is to
"tackle" or "manage" it in an appropriate manner. They have developed an
utter disregard for law — nay, a contempt for it; the feeling that law is
meant for lesser mortals and not for them. The courts in the country have
been trying to combat this trend, with some success as the recent events
show. But how many matters can be handled. How many more of such matters
are still there? The real question is how to swing the polity into action,
a polity which has become indolent and soft in its vitals? Can the courts
alone do it? Even so, to what extent, in the prevailing state of affairs?
Not that we wish to launch upon a diatribe against anyone in particular
but Judges of this Court are also permitted, we presume, to ask in
anguish, "what have we made of our country in less than fifty years"?
Where has the respect and regard for law gone? And who is responsible for
The Supreme Court of India is a creature of the
Constitution of India.
(For a complete information of the powers, composition, etc.
of Supreme Court of India visit its official website:
The Court and Constitution are eternal. Tainted judges come and go; where they should go.
In this case to the jail.
The Story in context from all 360 degrees is same if not more serious that that of the frauds committed by
Skipper Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. agaist Delhi Development Authority. The judgements delivered by the Supreme Court is the
evidence as how powerful the Court is. It can do and undo.
The endless crimes
committed byjudges of Supreme Court and other plotters are conviniently
and evidentially crafted under the heading of Plots. Bits of the
crimes committed by the Judges and misusing the Supreme Court thereby
judges disserving the judiciary is explained herebelow:
Who are the Judges
Members of the Society or The Beneficiaries of the
The list of the Judges who are Members of the
controversial Housing Society.
Who are the Judges heard the
matters related to the Houisng Society cases, contrary to the Law of
Justice S. Rajendra Babu, Justice R. P.
Justice S. Rajendra Babu conspired
with the said Housing Society in 1990 while he was a Judge of
Karnataka High Court in Writ Petition 2382 of 1990 [026.06] and gave a
stay order of an amount of Rs. 55 lakhs as legally demanded by the Govt.
of Karnataka [026.08]. The conspiracy of the Judge and the society is this
that they illegally and fraudaulantly suppressed the Agreement
[026.02] executed in accordance with Sec.41 of Land Acquisition
The fact of the
Society and Govt. having entered into Agreement / Contract is admitted by
not only the society [para 1 of 024.01][para 1 of 025.01] but also
the then Chief Justice of Karnataka Mr. Justice R. P.
judgement in Writ Appeal of the Society [para 4 of 026.04]. Matter of fact
Mr. Sethi is also a member of the Society and was elevated to Supreme
Matter of fact
Justice S. Rajendra Babu in the matter of another Housing Society
considered the aforesaid Agreement and the Land Aquisition is not for
Public Purpose but for a Company and allowed the Govt. to not to proceed
with the said aquisition proceedings despite of the fact that the Society
was prepared to pay all the money demands of the Govt. [003.05]
Justice Rajendra Babu in the case of "Release of Detinues
of Persons alleged to be helping hands in brigand Veerappan of Karnataka
forests", when the Karnataka Govt. appealed to the Supreme Court against
the order of special court; he dismissed the Special Leave Petition (SLP)
on the ground of delay of 358 days (less than one year) in approaching to
Supreme Court. On the contrary he along with the other brother judges of
Supreme Court, we suspect, got admitted SLP No. 12153 of 2000 in Supreme
Court. This SLP is by the said Housing Society against the judgement of
Justice R.P. Sethi aforementioned [026.04] of 1997. i.e. a delay of 3 long
Babu has constructed a house in the controversial Judicial Layout, and it
is learnt that the house is leased out to company as guest
The said Agreement fraudaulantly and illegally was
supressed by the plotters in collusion with Govt. of Karnataka in the
great trial wherein except two Judges all other Judges of Karnataka High
Court were respondents and other Judges including those of Supreme Court,
etc. were parties to the proceedings represented by the Housing Society
[027.01][027.02][027.03]027.04]. The judgement was reported in Law
Journals recited as ILR.1995.KAR.3138 [027.05]. If the agreement were
to be taken on record in the proceedings of the High Court, the Land
Acquisition/Lands Acquired would have been struck down and the Land should
have been directed to be returned to the erstwhile landowners in
accordance with the Supreme Court Judgement in the case of HMT Housing
Society [003.01]. This is a fraud by the Judges on the Judiciary. It is a
fit case for the Supreme Court to maintain not only its dignity and
decoram but also the confidence of the people of India in the
The Supreme Court way back in 1994 has authoritatively
has pronounced that the conversion of agricultural land (to any other
purpose than agricultural i.e. Residential, Commercial, or Industrial or
for any other reasons) is mandatory as per Sec. 95 [026.12] of
Karnataka Land Revenue Act. The said judgement of which the relevant
portion is also notified in the Gazette of Karnataka Govt. in 1995
It is surprising as how the Supreme Court judges along
with other plotters have been continuing to violate the said Supreme Court
judgement. If it is not Criminal Contempt of Court then what else? If
judges dont respect the judgements why should the public respect the
courts and the judgements??
In violation of the judgement and
without any Govt. or Court directions have gone ahead to form the layout,
2600 sale deeds of sites are registered in the guise of Bangalore
Development Authority (BDA) of which honorable Chief Minister of Karnataka
is incharge of the portfolio. The fact that BDA has not approved the
layout and the frauds committed by the society and its conspiracies as
defined in Sec.120 - A punishable under 120 - B read with Sec. 34 of IPC.
The frauds and conspiracies committed by the society, its members and the
allotees of the sites, we hope, the readers will believe by reading the
Writ Petition No.40994 of 2002 [040.02].
The Karnataka Lokayukta
(vigilance commission to investigate the corruption charges against Govt.
and Public servants), which hosted all India Lokayukta conference in
January 2003; inaugurated, attended and addressed by no less than
Vice-President of India and Home Minister of India. Those VVIPs of India
did not know that they were sharing the dias and sitting next to Mr. N.
Venkatachala the Lokayukta (vigilance commissioner) of Karnataka State who
is also a member of the Housing Society in context and beneficiary of
"Fruits of Contempt" committed by the Society in forming the controversial
Judicial layout. The lokayukta itself had issued "Search and Seizure"
warrant to the Housing Society if it fails to produce the layout plan
approved by BDA [023.27] [Flash Movie].