CD in News Papers

Canons of Judicial Ethics

Indian Judges'

Hall of Fame   

Message to Common Man

Corruption in Judiciary:
 Nil or Silenced ?

 867  Corrupt Judges
MEANS to ENDS  LuSt !

P.C.Act,1988

Rs.17 Lakh  Billion Scam  

Lok Ayukta + BDA

  Eagles' Eyes: Persecution  

Our Challenge  

Judges Vs Judges
Live Contempt Case

The Plots-in Brief

The Story - in Brief

The Plotters

History of Corruption in Judiciary

CBI Vs Judiciary

Only Good Judgment

Frauds

Frauds in Land Acquisition:

Conspiracy of Govt. Fraud Society

Judges' Society Cheating Govt.

Govt. Owes Rs.268 Crores to Farmers

Intelligence Bureau: Land Acquistion

Rs 172 Crores Public Property: Robbery

2600 Fraud Sale Deeds

Frauds on BDA

Cheating to BDA

Fraud Judges Society

Judges Fraud Society

Illegal Actions

Quest for Answers

Society's Bye-laws

2000+ Members List

Photos of Layout

List of Fraud judgments

Contempt of their very Fraud Judgments;  Staying of Legal Govt. Dues

Skeletons in Court

Supreme Court
SLP No.12153 of 2000

High Court of Karnataka
W.P. No. 15101 of 2001

High Court of Karnataka 
 Live Contempt Case:
Judges Vs Judges: CCC No.87 0f 2004

WP No.40994 of 2002

Demolish Sites

Sensitive Documents

ILR 1995 Kar 3139

SLP No.12153 of 2000

W.P. No. 15101 of 2001

WP No.40994 of 2002

Downloaded Sites

www.vrkrisnaiyer.org

FNJPC:  Judges R not Employees

Index to Documents

Etc.Etc.Etc.

and Much More inside

 

 
Prosecution of 867 Corrupt Judges of India

 

 

Letter Petition to CM B.S. Yeddyurappa

WHAT WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, EXPECT from: If the Constitutional Institutions and its Functionaries, at all they mean business nothing but acting in accordance with Constitution & the Laws made there under:
President of India          Parliament Of India            Supreme Court of India  
High Court of Karnataka  Government. of Karnataka 
Parliament: Practice and Procedure 


President of India

"I, President of India, being the Appointing Authority of Judges of Supreme Court and High Courts including Chief Justices thereof; so also I being the Authority to remove them as enshrined in Constitution of India and being of the considered opinion that the alleged crimes; reported in the web site which is substantiated evidentially in the CD I have received from CIPCJI; committed by Judges who are members of Fraud Judges Society; are prima facie have evidence to show that the crimes in the nature of corruption, conspiracy, cheating, contempt of court, etc. are committed and I am satisfied.

Under the circumstances, as advised by the "Council of Ministers headed by Prime Minister " I, hereby, in accordance with  Section 14 and Section 21of General Clauses Act of 1897 read with Article 367 of Constitution of India, consent to the permission seeked by CBI to prosecute the Judges of Supreme Court, High Courts and other such Judges who may be in Service by my Warrant of Appointment. 

Concurrently it is also directed that Govt. of India to keep me apprised of the courses of actions the different ministries are contemplating/initiated in the aforesaid Judges' Scandal."
 
Petition to the PRESIDENT OF INDIA [A103]                                                                
To  Top

Parliament Of India

Resolutions Of Houses of Parliament Of India

This House is of the opinion that ILR 1995 KAR 3139 [027.05][027.05s][027.11s]; a Judgment delivered by High Court of Karnataka in 1995 against Public Interest Litigation, in which case Union of India represented by Secretary to Law & Parlimentary Affairs of India was Respondent; the case be directed to be re-opened by Supreme Court and hear the case based on actual facts of case and so also the case be clubbed with SLP(Civil) No. 12153 of 2000 [026.22][026.22A ] filed by Fraud Judges Society.

This House is of the considered opinion that Justice S. Rajendra Babu [056.02] who is Chief Justice of India in-waiting, not to be appointed as Chief Justice of India in the event of the Office of the present Chief Justice of India becomes vacant, due to the frauds he has perpetrated by violating various laws and in contempt of various judgements the Fraud Judges Society has taken of which justice Rajendra Babu is a beneficiary as he having built house on the site alloted by the Fraud Judges Society in the controversial layout formed by Fraud Judges Society in Bangalore.                                            Top

This House is of the considered opinion that the lands on which the controversial Judicial Layout is formed is acquired by the Govt. of Karnataka in violation of Parliamentary Act No. 68 of 1984 by Fraud and conspiracy be hereby declared that the said land including the buildings what-so-ever on that land measuring approximately 193 acres be forfeited as an Illegally Acquired Property. The "Appellate Tribunal of Forfeited Property, New Delhi" be directed to receive the property as the custodian. President of India be requested to relieve Justice J. Eshwar Prasad from Chairmanship of the Tribunal; in case if he does not resign owning moral responsibility as a party to the crimes committed by the Fraud Judges Society due to the fact that he happens to be member of the Fraud Judges Society.                     Top

This House is of the considered opinion that Ministry of Agriculture be ditected to collect, compile & place an White Paper detailing the Implimentation & working of "Parliamentary Act No.68 of 1994  Vis-a-Vis Acquisition of Lands (belonging to Agriculturists) for Private Companies (including Housing Societies) in Karnataka since September24,1984" .                                         Top

This House is of the considered opinion that MINISTRY OF LAW, JUSTICE AND COMPANY AFFAIRS (Department of Justice) by its RESOLUTION dated 21st March, 1996 [055.01] had constituted First National Judicial Pay Commission [055.00] in part performance of implementation of Supreme Court directions arising out of All India Judges Association but on the contrary the other part of performance / implementation of direction of court i.e. Setting up of National Judicial Academy [055.02] having not been set up it is Resolved that the aforesaid Resolution be rescinded forthwith and further Resolve that both First National Judicial Pay Commission and National Judicial Academy be constituted / setup simultaneously and until such time the recommendations made by the said Pay Commission shall not be given effect to.                           Top

This House is of the considered opinion that Govt. of India should not give effect to the Recommendations made by First National Judicial Pay Commission and President of India be requested to relieve Justice K. Jagannatha Shetty, Chairman, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India and Justice A.B. Murgod (Retd.) Member Secretary in case if they do not resign owning moral responsibility as parties to the crimes committed by the Fraud Judges Society due to the fact that they happen to be members of the Fraud Judges Society.         Top

This House is of the considered opinion that Joint Parliamentary Committee be formed to investigate the affairs of Fraud Judges Society and to identify and fix the persons and Authorities who are responsible for the crimes committed and being allowed to continue so far & to find ways & means including Legislation to curb such incidents surfing in future .

This House is of the considered opinion that Govt. of India should Award & adore
"Centre for Investigation & Prosecution of Corrupt Judges of India" with  BHARAT RATNA  who have risked their Lives & so also spent Money-n-years investigating-n-compiling the Judges Scam ; which act of this House will go Long Way to communicate that Parliament, Govt. & CBI shall support NGO's & others to fight corruption & eradicate it. 
         Top

BHARAT RATNA


Supreme Court of India

In exercise of Article 32 of Constitution of India, Justice R.C. Lahoti, The Chief Justice of India & His Companion Judges [excluding Judges who are involved in the Scam] of the Hon'ble Supreme Court is humbly requested:

*To initiate the Criminal Contempt of Court proceedings in accordance with Section 2 (c) of Contempt of Court Act,1971 [041.05] against the Society & its Members for having committed acts in contempt of various judgments [501.00 ] which they have procured to form the so called Judicial Layout; the effect of which is to "abuse the process of courts" "to lower the dignity of courts" and "scandalizing or tending to scandalize the high court of Karnataka" and "Interfering and obstructing the administration of justice of Karnataka High Court". The members of the society who all claim to be the Judicial Department ; who inter alia include present [a] Supreme Court Judges [b] Retired Supreme Court Judges [c] Most of the present High Court Judges [d] Most of Retired High Court Judges retired between 1980 to 2002 [e] Law Secretaries to Government of Karnataka & their Sub-Ordinates from Judicial Department [f] District Magistrates of Karnataka [g] Lower Court Judges Karnataka [h] Lok Ayukta & most of the Magistrates on Deputation to Lok Ayukta etc., numbering about 2600 Employees of Judicial Department. [014]

* To direct CBI to initiate proceedings against the Fraud Judges as per Sec.7, Sec.8, Sec.9, Sec.11,Sec.13, and other provisions of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; for having failed to pay the Govt. demands as per the Agreement entered between the Society and Govt. on January 4th 1988 [005.01B][005.01][026.22][026.22A ] whereby the Society without paying the cost of lands to the Govt. procured lands from Govt. with Fraud Judgments with corrupt motives and in violation of Terms of Agreement.

* To direct CBI to initiate proceedings against the Fraud Judges as per Sec.7, Sec.8, Sec.9, Sec.11,Sec.13, and other provisions of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; for having failed to pay the Govt. demands as per the Agreement entered between the Society and Govt. on January 4th 1988 [005.01B][005.01] and the Society by Fraud suppressing this Agreement and thereby failing to get the lands converted from Agricultural to Residential use and thereby trying to cheat Govt. of Rs.1 crore since 1989 [026.06][026.08][026.09][026.04][026.22][026.22A ].             Top

* To direct CBI to initiate proceedings against the Fraud Judges as per Sec.7, Sec.8, Sec.9, Sec.11,Sec.13, and other provisions of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; for having failed to pay about Rs.5.50 lakhs per acre x 200 acres = Rs. 11 crores which is legal money the Society should have paid to Bangalore Development Authority which is not paid; but on the contrary 2600 sale deeds fraudulently [A107] has registered claiming that BDA has approved layout plan.[040.21][040.21s][Flash movie][040.02][023.27 ].

* To direct CBI to initiate proceedings against the Fraud Judges as per Sec.7, Sec.8, Sec.9, Sec.11,Sec.13, and other provisions of The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; the Fraud Judges Society procured the judgment against BDA and Sub-Registrar; in 1994 reported judgement as ILR 1994 KAR 2115 [025.13] under which judgment the Society should have Relinquished 50% of lands (about 100 acres) towards roads, parks, civic amenity sites and open spaces, etc.; but on the contrary the Society with corrupt motives in Contempt of the said Judgment have converted the Civic Amenity Sital area into about 500 illegal sites and are shared among the Judges, Ministers, Govt. Officials including Commissioners of Yelahanka City Municipal Corporation (CMC) with conspiracy to defraud BDA and the general public estimated of amount is as follows: 35% of 193 acres calculated to be misappropriated = 67.55 acres. Then 1 acre = 40 guntas, i.e. 40 guntas x 33 ft. x 33 ft. = 43,560 sq. ft. is One acre. 43,560 sq. ft x 67.55 acres x Rs.600 per sq. ft. = Rs.176,54,86,800 (Rs. 176.5 crores) [ 040.02 ]

*To recall all the orders, judgments directions issued by High Court of Karnataka, any other court or authority in relation to Fraud Judges Society. [501.00 ]

*To reopen all the Fraud Judgments secured by Fraud Judges Society  [501.00 ] and to proceed to hear the cases based upon the actual facts which were prevailing at the relevant times / year of the judgments and inter alia to proceed with the cases in tune with "Skipper Construction Company Vs. Delhi Development Authority" whereby to unveil the veil of judiciary in the interest of enhancing the confidence of the Public in courts and thereby to maintain "the dignity and authority of Supreme Court". [020.02][020.01][020.02s][020.01s][020.07s][020.07As][020.08s][020.09s][020.10s ].

*CBI be directed to seize the Office of the Fraud Judges Society which is located in the High Court premises in Bangalore.                                                    

*High Court of Karnataka be directed to cancel / rescind the approvals granted for procuring loans (for example [016.02][016.03]) from any private or govt. owned banks, institutions to help the members of the Fraud Judges Society for purchase of site or construction thereon in the controversial Judicial Layout forthwith. To this effect a Public Notice be also published in leading English and Kannada newspapers of Karnataka.                                                                                       Top

 

Chief Justice of India
S.H. Kapadia

  


Shri AP SINGH,

Director, CBI

 

High Court of india

 

Special Bench: Justices

R.M Reddy

H. Billappa

 Judges Vs Judges Case

*To end Un-Holy-Alliance between Judiciary of Karnataka and Govt. of Karnataka as the list of members of Fraud Judges Society goes to prove it; hence High Court of Karnataka is pleased to withdraw from forthwith the services of all Judges or Law Officers who are on deputation to Govt. of Karnataka.

*In the interest of Free and Fair Trial of cases pertaining to Fraud Judges Society and or of Judicial layout formed in Bangalore; High Court of Karnataka is pleased to transfer the cases namely WP No.15101 of 2001 [023.27], WP No.40994 of 2002 [040.02] and any other matters pending by or against the Fraud Judges Society to the Supreme Court of India with a request to club and hear the matters along with the Fraud Judges Society's Special Leave Petition No.12153 of 2000 [026.22][026.22A ] which is pending in Supreme Court.

*High Court of Karnataka is pleased to cancel / rescind the approvals granted for procuring loans (for example [016.02][016.03]) from any private or govt. owned banks, institutions to help the members of the Fraud Judges Society for purchase of site or construction thereon in the controversial Judicial Layout forthwith.

*CBI be directed to seize the Office of the Fraud Judges Society which is located in the High Court premises in Bangalore.                                  Top


Government of india

 

Shri Hansraj Bharadwaj
Governor of Karnataka

 

Shri B.S. Yeddyurappa
Chief Minister, Karnataka

New Lok Ayukta

Justice N Santosh Hegde


Click Me...

Most Corrupt Judge.
Justice N. Venkatachala
Lok Ayukta 
Karnataka

Decisions of the Cabinet of ministers of Karnataka Advocate General be requested to initiate Contempt of Court proceedings against the Fraud Judges Society and the beneficiaries of Judicial Layout for having committed Contempt of the judgment delivered by High Court of Karnataka through Justice G.P. Shivaprakash (who is member & has also built house) and procured by Fraud Judges Society in 1994 reported as ILR. 1994 KAR 2115 [Flash movie] read with Public Interest Litigation; filed by members of the Fraud Judges Society in the name of Judicial Layout Residents & Site Owners Association; in High Court of Karnataka WP No. 40994 of 2002. [040.18][040.21][040.02 ]

*In exercise of Section 76-N [031.S76N] of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 and other provisions of the said Act read with B.D.A. Act and Land Revenue Act the Govt. cancels the Resolution passed by B.D.A. [021.01][021.19s ] in favor of Fraud Judges Society namely Resolution passed vide Subject No. 503/92 based on the Fraud Judges Society's application dated 6th Nov. 1992. [021.01]

*The Sale Deeds [021.16][021.16s ] executed by or on behalf of Fraud Judges Society on who-so-ever's name be and hereby stands cancelled as all the said Sale Deeds deemed to having been Registered fraudulently in accordance with Section 23 of The Indian Contract Act, 1872.

*City Municipal Council (CMC) of Yelanka, Bangalore be directed to cancel all the khathas opened in relation to the sites formed in the illegal Judicial Layout based on Fraudulent Sale Deeds.                                                         Top

*It is recommended in the interest of maintaining probity in governance it is considered as a fit case to be referred to CBI to investigate the affairs of the Fraud Judges Society exercising the powers enshrined under Article 258 A [033.258A] and the investigations that was and is being made by Lok Ayukta or Upa Lok Ayukta [023 ] also be made over to CBI as the present Lok Ayukta and his sub-ordinate judges on deputation are suspected to be members and/or beneficiaries of Fraud Judges Society.

*The Advocate General is requested to file a Memo in High Court of Karnataka for Transfer of cases namely WP No.15101 of 2001 [023.27], WP No.40994 of 2002 [040.02] and any other matters pending by or against the Fraud Judges Society to the Supreme Court of India with a request to club and hear the matters along with the Fraud Judges Society's Special Leave Petition No.12153 of 2000 [026.22][026.22A ] which is pending in Supreme Court in the interest of free and fair trial of the cases.

*In accordance with All India Judges' Cases [037.01][037.02][037.02A ]; to keep Govt. of Karnataka free of High Court of Karnataka; High Court of Karnataka be directed to withdraw all Judicial Officers or Judges on deputation to work in Govt. of Karnataka and its departments and Authorities.

*Department of Personnel And Reforms (DPAR) be directed to direct Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC) to recruit Law Officers to serve permanently in Govt. as its Employees.

*During the interregnum period Central Govt. may be requested to spare Law Officers to work in place of Judicial Officers or Judges on deputation from High Court of Karnataka.                                                       
Top

 Parliament: Practice and Procedure

053.01 Proceedings in Parliament
053.02 Proceedings in Parliament Criminal Law
053.03 parliament and Judiciary
053.03A Appointment of Judges
053.03B Conditions of Service of Judges
053.03C Resignation Removal of Judges from office
053.03D Relation of Courts to the Legislature
053.03E Courts not to Inquire into Proceedings of Parliament
053.03F Appointment of Chief Justice of India / super session of Judges of Supreme Court,  etc. have been discussed in the Lok Sabha
053.03G Discussion on sub Judice Matters

054 M.S. Shoes case discussed in Parliament: Ram Jethmalani

054.01 M.S. Shoes case discussed in Parliament: Ram Jethmalani

Top

 Home

Investigations

The Plots

Corruption in Judiciary Resolutions